hmm interesting, although it's still not/* thorough in explaining a lot of ideas/relations conveyed in his arguement.
agreed. i was drawn to it cuz the section on the "mountain moving". kinda tied into my philosophy discussion today about bookV of the republic.
Gotta say there is some small truth to what he says, in very specific instances but by and large, this guy is whacked. I see some areas where he is just plain wrong. Very eloquent for someone who is ignorant of many things he talks of.
plz point out the ignorance.